Drawing for POWERSTART XPRESS

USPTO serial 77854157

POWERSTART XPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERSTART XPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I. PEROFF HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP7 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in agriculture, namely, silage additives for forage treatmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance