USPTO serial 77854450
THE DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
6060 CENTER DRFL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable video recordings featuring music; downloadable video recordings featuring documentaries, interviews and non-fictional stories in the field of the punk rock and heavy metal music bands and personalities performing in the 1980's and 1990's | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |