USPTO serial 77854460
THE DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J. STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DRIVETENTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books featuring the punk rock and heavy metal music bands and personalities performing in the 1980's and 1990's, journals featuring the punk rock and heavy metal music bands and personalities performing in the 1980's and 1990's, calendars, greeting cards, occasional cards in the nature of birthday cards, Christmas cards and seasonal cards, stationery, notebooks, notepads, souvenir books featuring the punk rock and heavy metal music bands and personalities performing in the 1980's and 1990's, writing instruments, bookmarks, blank writing journals, gift wrapping paper, stickers and decalcomanias, trading cards, paper party favors and paper party decorations, namely, paper napkins, paper doilies, paper place mats, crepe paper, invitations, paper table cloths | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |