USPTO serial 77854635
MICRO CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3939256Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2011
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICRO CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles F. Woodhouse, Esq.
CHARLES F. WOODHOUSE, ESQ. WOODHOUSE SHANAHAN PA910 17TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-2606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen seafood dinners, appetizers, and side dishes; pre-packaged frozen meals, appetizers and side dishes consisting primarily of seafood, poultry, meat, or vegetables, and which may include pasta, rice, or other starches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 26, 2010 |
| 030 | Frozen meals, appetizers, and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 26, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | IIOA | INADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |