Drawing for BEAUTY BAY

USPTO serial 77855722

BEAUTY BAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEAUTY BAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles J. Meyer

JEFFREY G KNOWLES COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLPONE FERRY BUILDINGSUITE 200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of fragrances, perfume, toiletries, cosmetics, soaps, shampoos, hair care preparations, skin care preparations, essential oils, sun care and tanning preparationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 9, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 9, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 9, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 10, 2011OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 7, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 21, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 25, 2010LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Mar 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance