USPTO serial 77855741
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Winston-Salem, NC
Winston-Salem, NC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
JENNIFER M. MIKULINA MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use in emergency response services; computer software for use in records management; computer software for use in video surveillance; computer software for use with a mobile computing device to support data transfer between the mobile device and a remote server; communications software for accessing emergency response information; computer software for use in dispatch of emergency response services and data mapping; computer hardware and software system for tracking people, objects and emergency response vehicles using GPS data on a device; computer software for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties in the field of emergency response services; computer software for managing emergency response centers and for providing access to emergency response system information; communications equipment, namely, emergency call controllers and routers and voice-over IP call controllers and selective routers; computer telephony interface software; digital cameras; computer network routers, switches and hubs; electronic communication systems that facilitate access to and use of emergency information by emergency administration personnel and public service access providers | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Project management in the field of emergency response services; consultation services regarding the writing of grant proposals for government agencies; interoperable network management services, namely, the operation and administration of emergency response communication systems and networks for others that allow users to communicate across multiple networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation of communication systems, namely, installation of computer systems, emergency call controllers and routers, voice-over IP call controllers, computer telephony interface equipment, and cameras; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of the repair of computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of communication services and emergency response services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; computer disaster recovery planning; cloud computing featuring software for use in connection with emergency response services; providing on demand use of non-downloadable computer software for use in connection with emergency response services; mobile data services, namely, computer-aided transmission of data, text, sounds, and images from remote servers to computers and portable devices; computer services, namely, providing client or server platforms to allow users to request data from repositories and to receive data to a mobile device; application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software and databases in the fields of wireless communication, mobile information access, and remote data management for wireless delivery of content to handheld computers, laptops and mobile electronic devices; installation of communication systems, namely, installation of computer software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |