USPTO serial 77855808
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bujold
NEAL E FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD PLLC112 PLEASANT STREETCONCORD, NH 03301-2931UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee; tea; tea blends; decaffeinated coffee; hot chocolate; coffee-based beverages, namely, cafe mochas and cafe au laits; prepared espresso and espresso-based beverages, namely, lattes, mochas, americanos and cappuccinos; iced drinks, namely, iced coffee; frozen drinks, namely, frozen mochas, frozen lattes, frozen coffee; frozen drinks, namely, ice blended drinks, namely, iced coffee; hot drinks, namely, coffee based beverages; baked goods, namely, bakery goods; bakery goods, namely, buttermilk bars, muffins, scones, biscuits, donuts, biscotti; Fried dough with powdered sugar, namely, beignet, zeppola | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Smoothies; iced drinks, namely, iced fruit beverages; Italian sodas; frozen drinks, namely, ice blended fruit drinks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |