Drawing for USP UNIFIED SECURITY PLATFORM

USPTO serial 77856822

USP UNIFIED SECURITY PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USP UNIFIED SECURITY PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for the collection and handling of information concerning location-related events, to assist government authorities or large organizations in the fields of crisis management, incident management, transport security, real-time vehicular tracking, citizen safety, said information consisting of input from tele-surveillance cameras, alerts from areas monitored via video analytics, population and police databases, incoming phone calls to a command center; and further related to security in general with emphasis on communications support over computer networks and global communication networksACTIVE—
016Hardware and software documentation, namely, reference, user, instructional and general procedure manuals and data sheets for a group of applications and their related services, designed to assist government authorities or large organizations to meet security and citizen safety needs, for final users of said computer hardware and software, in charge of said applicationsACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, the secure receipt and delivery of messages, queries, documents and other data by electronic transmission; technical telecommunications consultation in the field of selecting end enabling the required services and physical means, depending on the selected or available telecommunications infrastructuresACTIVE—
042Design and programming of device networking hardware and software solutions; technological consulting services in the field of requirements analysis related to the design, development, configuration, customization and deployment of security solutions, event monitoring and surveillance systems and services; and technical support thereof, namely, installation and troubleshooting of computer software, networked communications between computer systems, and interconnected security and sensing devices in the nature of digital video cameras, panic alarm buttons, global positioning system receivers, and various telemetry sensors, namely hydro-meteorological sensors, pluviometers and anemometersACTIVE—
045Real-time electronic event monitoring services for security purposes in the fields of public surveillance, incident logging, response management and dispatching, transport security, real-time vehicular tracking, and detection of most types of public threats, where selected areas, locations, public spaces and roads are provided with suitable video cameras and sensing and/or measuring devices in order to prevent or cope with events potentially hazardous to public safety; and providing information related thereto over computer networks with the aim of facilitating the management of the resources of government agencies to prevent or handle such events; consulting services in the field of monitoring and providing information about location-related events related to public security management and crisis prevention over computer networks and global communication networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance