USPTO serial 77856834
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
JEFFREY M. FURR FURR LAW FIRM2622 DEBOLT RDUTICA, OH 43080-9604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the collection and handling of information concerning location-related events, to assist government authorities or large organizations in the fields of crisis management, incident management, transport security, real-time vehicular tracking, citizen safety, said information consisting of input from tele-surveillance cameras, alerts from areas monitored via video analytics, population and police databases, incoming phone calls to a command center; and further related to security in general with emphasis on communications support over computer networks and global communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Hardware and software documentation, namely, reference, user, instructional and general procedure manuals and data sheets for a group of applications and their related services, designed to assist government authorities or large organizations to meet security and citizen safety needs, for final users of said computer hardware and software, in charge of said applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the secure receipt and delivery of messages, queries, documents and other data by electronic transmission; technical telecommunications consultation in the field of selecting end enabling the required services and physical means, depending on the selected or available telecommunications infrastructures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and programming of device networking hardware and software solutions; strategic planning and technological consulting services in the field of requirements analysis related to the design, development, configuration, customization and deployment of security solutions, event monitoring and surveillance systems and services; and technical support thereof, namely, installation and troubleshooting of computer software, communications, and interconnected systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Real-time electronic event monitoring services for security purposes in the fields of public surveillance, incident logging, response management and dispatching, transport security, real-time vehicular tracking, and detection of most types of public threats, where selected areas, locations, public spaces and roads are provided with suitable video cameras and sensing and/or measuring devices in order to prevent or cope with events potentially hazardous to public safety; and providing information related thereto over computer networks with the aim of facilitating the management of the resources of government agencies to prevent or handle such events; consulting services in the field of monitoring and providing information about location-related events related to public security management and crisis prevention over computer networks and global communication networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |