USPTO serial 77856865
XYLEM ADVANCED ORGANIC SKIN SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XYLEM ADVANCED ORGANIC SKIN SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Carlsen
Ann Carlsen Ann Carlsen & CompanySte 501, 3292 Production WayBurnaby, BC, V5A 4R4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin soaps; bath gels, bath oils, bath salts; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely lotions, creams, cleansers, scrubs, masks exfoliators, and toners; hair care and hair styling preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, finishing sprays and gels; cosmetics, namely, foundations, concealers, mascaras, eye shadows, eye liners, brow liners, lipsticks, lip liners, lip balms, face powders, bronzers, blushers, moisturizers, make-up removers; non-medicated body powder; sun-tanning preparations; sunscreen oils and lotions; shaving preparations; perfumes, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use, perfume oils; nail care preparations, nail enamels, nail polishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |