Drawing for CALIBER

USPTO serial 77857855

CALIBER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIBER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew I. Berger

MATTHEW I. BERGER MATTHEW I BERGER LAW GROUP, APC10 E Islay StSanta Barbara, CA 93101-2423UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game cartridges and discs; Computer game software for use with personal computers, home video game consoles used with televisions, and for arcade-based video game consoles; Pre-recorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring music and films in the field of fantasy, action, adventure and dramaACTIVE—
016Books in the field of mythology, western fiction, legends about King Arthur of England, and fiction; Comic books; Graphic novels; Picture books; Series of fiction works, namely, novels and books; Story booksACTIVEJul 1, 2008
028Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy bows and arrows; Toy guns; Toy swordsACTIVE—
041Motion picture film productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 3, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance