USPTO serial 77858181
EMBOLISTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMBOLISTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ben Natter
Ben Natter HAUG PARTNERS LLP745 Fifth AveNew York, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Health care services, namely, providing a medical, surgical and health database featuring medical, surgical, and health information relating to medical implants that has been input, collected, received, prepared, controlled, programmed, calculated, and analyzed, from medical implants, remote controls or control stations for use by medical, surgical and health professionals for the purposes of monitoring and diagnosing medical conditions; medical and surgical services, namely, implantation of artificial implants for collecting, sending, receiving, storing, preparing, controlling, presenting, calculating, analyzing, and processing of data to and from patients, to and from medical implants, to and from remote controls, wireless charger apparatus, and/or control stations for active implants; medical and surgical services, namely, artificial implantation of medical implants for programming, controlling, communicating with and/or energizing of active implants; and medical and surgical services, namely, artificial implantation services for persons having a medical related condition and being candidates for or being operated on with an active or a non-active implant | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |