USPTO serial 77859399
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC50 S. 16th StreetPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2516UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, handbags, purses, sport bags, athletic bags, beach bags, cosmetic bags, garment bags, laundry bags, overnight bags, school bags, shoes bags, sleeping bags, travel bags; umbrellas; fur | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear, namely, shoes, boots, slippers, thongs, sandals, athletic footwear, beach footwear, casual footwear, evening footwear, exercise footwear; men's, women's and children's clothing, wearing apparel, namely, anoraks, aprons, belts for clothing, bath wraps, blouses, bodysuits, bath robes, blazers, buttons, bathing suits, baseball shirts, blousons, baseball uniforms, briefs, brassieres, braces, capes, cardigans, culottes, cravattes, coats, camisoles, chemises, collars, collar protectors, dickies, dresses, dressing gowns, ear muffs, formal wear, namely, tuxedos, evening gowns, jackets, pants, shirts, neckties, cumberbunds, foulards, fur stoles, fur muffs, fur jackets, fur hats, fur coats, fur jackets, garters, girdles, goggles, protective gloves, winter gloves, hoods, hosiery, housecotas, jogging suits, jeans, jackets, jumpers, jumpsuits, jerseys, leg warmers, leotards, lingerie, leggings, loungewear, mittens, muffs, mantles, mufflers, neckerchiefs, neckwarmers, nightgowns, nightshirts, nighties, overalls, overcoats, pullovers, pantyhose, parkas, pyjamas, pants, petticoats, ponchos, racing suits, robes raincoats, shorts, singlets, sweatsuits, shirts, sweaters, socks, swimwear, stockings, scarves, shawls, skirts, sashes, sweatpants, sweatshirts, sweat tops, suits, suspenders, sleepers, sleepwear, sun suits, sweat jackets, snowsuits, swimsuits, tank tops, trousers, thongs, t-shirts, tops, tights, ties, uniforms, namely, medical personnel uniforms, school uniforms and sport uniforms, underwear, underpants, undershirts, unitards, vests, visors, waistcoats, wristbands, warm up pants, warm up tops; headwear, namely, caps, hats, berets, toques, scarves, headbands | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |