Drawing for SSFSA CERTIFIED CODE COMPLIANT

USPTO serial 77859631

SSFSA CERTIFIED CODE COMPLIANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SSFSA CERTIFIED CODE COMPLIANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark W. Hendricksen

MARK W HENDRICKSEN WELLS ST JOHN PS601 W 1ST AVE STE 1300SPOKANE, WA 99201-3807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purposes of certification in the field of the use of cold-formed steel tracks and steel framing studsACTIVEOct 5, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 14, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 28, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 28, 2012RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Apr 5, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 16, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance