USPTO serial 77860009
LT L & T INFOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4348434Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2013
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LT L & T INFOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
MUMBAI, IN
LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
MUMBAI, IN
LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
MUMBAI, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander S. Lazousi
Alexander S. Lazousi Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin TerraceSuite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing, transmitting, logging recording and storing data; portal and internet access devices, namely, modems and terminals; telecommunication, photographic and cinematographic equipment, namely, visual and digital display devices, namely, liquid crystal (LCD) monitors and light emitting diode (LED) displays, cameras, and cinematographic recording equipment; teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, computer terminals and projectors; visual data converters, namely, converter equipment for recorded visual data; satellite communication, wireless and signaling apparatus, namely, satellite receivers and computer terminals, wireless transmitters and receivers; computers, computer interfaces, namely, USB hardware, computer modems, wires and cables for connecting voice, video and data communications equipment; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, audio and video recorders, and amplifiers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LARSEN & TOUBRO INFOTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LT L & T INFOTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |