Drawing for MAGNET-SCHULTZ SPECIALIST FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATORS AND SENSORS

USPTO serial 77860730

MAGNET-SCHULTZ SPECIALIST FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATORS AND SENSORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATE, TARA J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGNET-SCHULTZ SPECIALIST FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTUATORS AND SENSORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007brakes for use as parts of machines; chucks used for holding piece parts on machine tools; magnetic couplings for machines except for land vehicles, magnetic brakes for use as parts of machines and parts thereof; electromagnetic vibrator coils for use in machines and as machine parts; permanent magnet and pressure-actuated couplings for machines except for land vehicles and brakes for use as parts of machines; hydraulically, pneumatically and electromagnetically actuated gears, steering mechanisms, couplings and brakes and parts therefor for machines, except for land vehicles; hydraulic and pneumatic controls for machines, motors and engines, and parts therefor and installations consisting thereof; and electric motors for machines, other than for land vehiclesACTIVE—
009Electromagnetic couplings except for land vehicles; electromagnetic controls for machines, motors and engines, and parts therefor and installations consisting thereof; electromagnetic vibrator coils for generating vibrations; transformers; electric, electromechanical, and electronic flow switches for controlling the flow of electric current, gas and fluids; controls and regulating apparatus for controlling and regulating electricity, gas, or fluids, namely, voltage regulators and electronic valves for controlling gas or fluids, and installations consisting thereof; electric, electromechanical, and electronic valve controls for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; rectifiers; non-contact electric switches; physical and electrotechnical apparatus, instruments and devices, namely, electromagnets and permanent magnets for controlling electricity, gas, or fluids; electric and electronic control and regulating apparatus for the operation of magnets, in particular for adhesive magnets, locking magnets, oscillating magnets, electromagnetic vibrators, activation magnets and valve magnets; magnets, in particular electromagnets for direct current, alternating current and rotary current; electric contactors and magnetic switches, namely, automatically actuated switches; mounting magnets, lifting magnets; magnets, in particular adhesive magnets, locking magnets, oscillating magnets, activation magnets and valve magnets; electromagnetically actuated valves for controlling gas and fluids; and electric relaysACTIVE—
012Hydraulically, pneumatically and electromagnetically actuated gears, steering units, couplings and brakes, and parts therefor for land vehicles; magnetic brakes for vehicles, electric motors for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance