CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ONE CARE HEALTH PLAN

USPTO serial 77860764

ONE CARE HEALTH PLAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE CARE HEALTH PLAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Miriam Claire Beezy

MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY FOLEY & LARDNER LLP555 S FLOWER STSTE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2411

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, newsletters related to health, health care and health maintenance organization servicesACTIVE—
035Health care cost containment services, namely, coordinating provision of health care at reduced costs to participating membersACTIVE—
036Prepaid financing and administration of pharmaceutical care, medical care and rehabilitative careACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, classes, seminars, lectures and workshops all related to substance abuse, family, fitness, prenatal care, lifestyle and general healthACTIVE—
044Rehabilitation services for the disabled; consulting services in the field of health care, medical care, and health maintenance organization servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 15, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance