CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WHAT WOULD TYLER DURDEN DO?

USPTO serial 77860899

WHAT WOULD TYLER DURDEN DO?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3834113Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with WHAT WOULD TYLER DURDEN DO??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginie L. Parant

Virginie L. Parant ARTech law3500 W. Olive avenue#300Burbank, CA 91505

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing information, news, commentary, and photo presentations in the fields of entertainment, television, movies, music, pop culture, and celebrities via global computer networks, mobile telephones, and other digital communication networks and devices; online journals, namely, blogs in the fields of entertainment, television, movies, music, pop culture, and celebritiesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 29, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 2, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2016E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 10, 2015C.7CNEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Nov 30, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 11, 2015ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 6, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 17, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 16, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 9, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance