USPTO serial 77861359
ASARI THE PROFESSIONAL CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASARI THE PROFESSIONAL CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. LITMAN
RICHARD C. LITMAN Litman Law Offices, Ltd.8955 Center StreetManassas, VA 20110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Artificial chum for fishing; Artificial fishing bait; Artificial fishing lures; Artificial fishing worms; Bait bags for holding live bait; Bite indicators; Bite sensors; Fish attractants; Fish bite alarm and strike indicator; Fish hook removers; Fish hooks; Fishing aid which sinks to the bottom of any body of water in which it is placed and stands vertically from the bottom with fish line attached a few inches from the hook intended to catch the fish; Fishing bait holder; Fishing buoys; Fishing clamps for use in holding fish to remove fish hooks; Fishing creels; Fishing equipment, namely, clamps for securing fishing equipment on body; Fishing equipment, namely, winging material for fishing jigs and streamers; Fishing flies; Fishing floats; Fishing fly boxes; Fishing gaffs; Fishing hooks; Fishing leaders; Fishing lines; Fishing lure boxes; Fishing lure parts; Fishing lures; Fishing lures, namely, leeches; Fishing lures, namely, plastic worms; Fishing lures, namely, spoons; Fishing plugs; Fishing pole holders worn on the body; Fishing poles; Fishing reels; Fishing rod blanks; Fishing rod cases; Fishing rod handles; Fishing rod holders; Fishing rod racks; Fishing rods; Fishing safety harness; Fishing sinkers; Fishing spinners; Fishing tackle; Fishing tackle bags; Fishing tackle boxes; Fishing tackle containers; Fishing tackle, namely, bobbers; Fishing tackle, namely, lighted bobbers; Fishing weights; Flies for use in fishing; Floats for fishing; Gut for fishing; Hand-held fishing nets; Hand-held fishing nets for sportsmen; Ice fishing strike indicator; Inflatable float tubes for fishing; Lines for fishing; Lures for fishing; Lures for hunting or fishing; Packaged freeze-dried fishing bait; Reels for fishing; Rods for fishing; Scent lures for hunting or fishing; Spears for use in fishing; Sport fishing accessory, namely, a device which holds the lip of a fish caught by an angler for ease of landing, weighing and release; Sportsman's fishing bags | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |