USPTO serial 77861723
BASELINE VIEWER, DIRECTION, FORWARD BASELINE SET, AVG VELOCITY, PROFILE FACTOR, SWIRL ANGLE, SYMMETRY, CROSS-FLOW, TURBULENCE A, TURBULENCE B, TURBULENCE C, TURBULENCE D, DISPLAY, 1-MINUTE AVERAGES VALID, CURRENT VALUES, CLOSE, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASELINE VIEWER, DIRECTION, FORWARD BASELINE SET, AVG VELOCITY, PROFILE FACTOR, SWIRL ANGLE, SYMMETRY, CROSS-FLOW, TURBULENCE A, TURBULENCE B, TURBULENCE C, TURBULENCE D, DISPLAY, 1-MINUTE AVERAGES VALID, CURRENT VALUES, CLOSE, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Pierce
JONATHAN PIERCE CONLEY ROSE, P.C.PO BOX 3267HOUSTON, TX 77253-3267UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, user interface computer software used in the oil and gas industry to monitor and collect real-time and historical measurement data from flow meters, to configure upper and lower operational limits of flow meters, to log diagnostic information about the performance of flow meters, to perform historical analysis of flow meters, and to support communications regarding such information to host computers | ACTIVE | Oct 29, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Daniel Measurement and Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BASELINE VIEWER, DIRECTION, FORWARD BASELINE SET, AVG VELOCITY, PROFILE FACTOR, SWIRL ANGLE, SYMMETRY, CROSS-FLOW, TURBULENCE A, TURBULENCE B, TURBULENCE C, TURBULENCE D, DISPLAY, 1-MINUTE AVERAGES VALID, CURRENT VALUES, CLOSE, 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |