USPTO serial 77862379
X-RINGER HV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4295932Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2013
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with X-RINGER HV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
POWAY, CA
Miramar Strategic Ventures, LLC
Carlsbad, CA
Miramar Strategic Ventures, LLC
Carlsbad, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sherinsky
Joseph Sherinsky Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings America, Inc.655 Third Avenue, 15th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Archery arrows; archery equipment, namely, arrow nocks, nock inserts, arrow points, arrow tips, arrow shafts and fletching | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALDILA GOLF CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Miramar Strategic Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Miramar Strategic Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MCA GOLF, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALDILA GOLF CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named X-RINGER HV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 29, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 16, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |