Drawing for OLYMPIA

USPTO serial 77862672

OLYMPIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLYMPIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Starshak

KATHRYN STARSHAK K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, band saw blades; band sawsACTIVEFeb 23, 1965

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 22, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 30, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 30, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 30, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance