Drawing for BISCOFF

USPTO serial 77862831

BISCOFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, KEVIN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BISCOFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David B. Kirschstein, Esq.

DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN, ESQ. KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERONI, P.C.425 5TH AVE FL 5NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030ICE CREAMACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 4, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 18, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 23, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance