USPTO serial 77863025
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Parkins Rabin
JENNIFER PARKINS RABIN AKERMAN SENTERFITT222 LAKEVIEW AVE 4TH FLWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring ready to paint pottery and mosaic forms | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 5, 2011 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |