USPTO serial 77863250
PENSKE TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PENSKE TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hammers; Hand tool, namely, rigid and rod hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools, namely, bolt cutters; Hand tools, namely, clamps; Hand tools, namely, crimping irons; Hand tools, namely, drills; Hand tools, namely, files; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools, namely, hand jacks; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated device to aid with tying and untying knots; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, hatchets; Hand tools, namely, hex keys wrenches; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated sharpening wheels; Hand tools, namely, mauls; Hand tools, namely, miter boxes; Hand tools, namely, mitre boxes; Hand tools, namely, nail sets; Hand tools, namely, nippers; Hand tools, namely, nut drivers; Hand tools, namely, paint scrapers; Hand tools, namely, picks; Hand tools, namely, pikes; Hand tools, namely, pincers; Hand tools, namely, planers; Hand tools, namely, planes; Hand tools, namely, post hole diggers; Hand tools, namely, pruners; Hand tools, namely, pruning saws; Hand tools, namely, punches; Hand tools, namely, putty knives; Hand tools, namely, rammers; Hand tools, namely, rasps; Hand tools, namely, ratchet wrenches; Hand tools, namely, reamers; Hand tools, namely, ripping bars; Hand tools, namely, sanders; Hand tools, namely, saws; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Hand tools, namely, screwdrivers; Hand tools, namely, socket sets; Hand tools, namely, socket wrenches; Hand tools, namely, tools for placing a rope or other flexible member through an eye or around a target object; Hand tools, namely, vices. Hand tools, namely, wedges; Hand tools, namely, wire cutters; Hand tools, namely, wire nippers; Hand tools, namely, wire strippers; Hand tools, namely, wrecking bars, stripping bars, small bars and nail pullers, San Angelo bars, tamper bars, wedge point bars, pitch point bars; Hand tools, namely, wrenches; Hand-operated cutting tools; Hand-operated cutting tools, namely, box cutters; Hand-operated cutting tools, namely, safety cutters; Hand-operated riveting tools; Hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand-powered ice augers used for ice fishing; Hand-powered staple guns; Hand-tools, namely, wire crimpers; Ice hammers; Manual drills; Manually-powered hole openers used to enlarge holes in the ground; Nut wrenches; Pipe wrenches; Ratchet handles; Roll-up fabric container for hand tools; Sanding pads for non-electric, hand-operated sanders; Screw wrenches; Sculpting tools, namely, loops; Spark wrenches; Tool aprons; Tool belts; Tool holders; Tool pouches for attachment to tool belts; Torque wrenches; Wrenches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |