Drawing for MELASCOPIC

USPTO serial 77863322

MELASCOPIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MELASCOPIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia J. Walden

CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN Fish & Richardson P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for analyzing the images from electro-optical imaging devicesACTIVE
010Medical devices, namely, electro-optical devices incorporating both hardware and software for obtaining images in different spectral bands and software for analyzing the images for use in analyzing skin lesions and determining the existence of melanoma; instrumentation comprising computer-assisted optical images and image analyzers for use in the detection of dental caries, cutaneous melanoma and other pathology of teeth, skin and tissuesACTIVE
044Medical services, namely, diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and other pathology of skin and tissuesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 8, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 6, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance