USPTO serial 77863490
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen F. Baraloto
CATHLEEN F. BARALOTO FAEGRE & BENSON LLP90 S 7TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Diapers for adults | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Laboratory clothing; protection masks; clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire, used in a health care setting | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical treatment apparel; surgical gowns; medical gowns; patient examination gowns; surgical scrub suits; medical wearing apparel, namely scrub tops and pants; medical treatment suits for use in clean rooms; medical treatment apparel, namely, surgeons and nurses caps; surgical masks; surgical shoe covers; medical protective clothing and apparel against germs, bacteria, blood or body fluids; medical protective clothing resistant to viruses | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Disposable baby diapers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Cloth baby diapers; medical uniforms; emergency medical service personnel uniforms; ambulance attendants uniforms; uniforms for healthcare professionals; sleepwear; lab coats; slippers; socks; one piece coveralls; hats; jackets; boots; aprons | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |