CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS

USPTO serial 77863659

FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay R. Sherman

KAY R. SHERMAN Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C.101 S. HANLEY ROAD, SUITE 1700ST. LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical compositions for use as simulated contaminants in use in training for decontamination procedures; kits comprised primarily of chemical compositions and also including swabs and assay supplies, for use in training for decontamination procedures; decontaminants for neutralizing and destroying hazardous chemical and biological agents and toxic chemical compounds, toxic industrial materials, and toxinsACTIVE—
005antimicrobial fluids, namely, sporicides, sterilants, disinfectants, sanitizers, fungicides, mold-killers, and decontaminants to kill microbes on various surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 18, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance