Drawing for MULTI-WIN POKER

USPTO serial 77863837

MULTI-WIN POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTI-WIN POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming machines; and equipment, namely, video poker machines, electronic gaming machines, computerized video table games for gaming purposes, and electronic table game programs; computer gaming softwareACTIVE—
028Gaming equipment, namely, gaming tables, poker tables, chips, poker chips, and game wheelsACTIVE—
041Entertainment and gaming services in the nature of casino gaming, leasing of electronic gaming machines, and providing a web-based system for customers to participate in gamingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2017WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2017WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 18, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance