Drawing for Serial No. 77863947

USPTO serial 77863947

Serial No. 77863947

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 77863947?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal E. Friedman

NEAL E. FRIEDMAN DAVIS & BUJOLD, P.L.L.C.112 PLEASANT STCONCORD, NH 03301-2931UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Systematization of data in a central database, management of electronic files, management and compilation of computerized data bases for others; management of databasesACTIVE—
038Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning private data, concerning professional data and concerning private and professional data, concerning general or specific geographical, economic information, historic events and tourists information; providing access to databases, providing voice and electronic mail communication by InternetACTIVE—
042Reconstitution of databases for others, conversion of data and informatic programs other than physical conversion, supply of search engines for Internet; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community of users to participate in discussions and for registered users to participate in discussions; computer services, namely, generating electronic information identification codes for determining the geographical location of people, individuals and objects, stationary or movable objectsACTIVE—
045Generating electronic informatic codes for identification authentication, security access to control of buildings and placesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 6, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance