USPTO serial 77863962
CITILINK BROADBAND SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITILINK BROADBAND SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON BYRON PA200 S 6TH STSTE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | wireless broadband communication services, namely, providing voice-over internet protocol services, point to point internet access connections, and internet access services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |