Drawing for DATAHUB

USPTO serial 77864283

DATAHUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3956118Status 780Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 3, 2011
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DATAHUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT W. JOHNSTON

SCOTT W. JOHNSTON MERCHANT & GOULD PC150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, SUITE 2200P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, for use in the distribution and sharing of data, and user manuals provided in connection therewith; computer software, namely, for acting as middleware to allow disparate software systems to communicate among one another, and user manuals provided in connection therewith; computer software, namely, for protocol conversion, network transmission and communication among multiple protocols, and user manuals provided in connection therewithACTIVEAug 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2024TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 2, 2024CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2024CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 2022PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2021NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2021RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 19, 202189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 12, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2021PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Aug 3, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 20, 2021E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 3, 2020REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2017NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 20178.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 29, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2017ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2011CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance