USPTO serial 77864284
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mount Vernon, WA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software development tools; Computer software for computer system and application development, deployment and management; Web site development software | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2007 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Computer hardware and software consulting services; Computer programming and software design; Computer programming services for others in the field of software configuration management; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software consulting; Computer software design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Creating, maintaining, and modernizing computer software; Customized software development services; Database design and development; Database development services; Debugging computer software for others; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design and testing for new product development; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Design, development and consulting services in the field of software for content management; Design, development and implementation of software; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Designing and developing webpages on the internet; Developing and updating computer software; Developing computer software; Development, design and updating of home pages; Development, updating and maintenance of software and data bases; Maintenance and updating of computer software; Maintenance and upgrading of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Product development; Product development and engineering services for others; Product development consultation; Product development for others; Product research and development; Programming of computer software for others; Research and development of computer software; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for use of building SaaS applications.; Software design and development; Software development for others in the field of software configuration management; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Web site development for others; Website development for others; Writing and updating computer software | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |