USPTO serial 77864637
FLUXFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4143067Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLUXFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Orlando
JOSEPH J. ORLANDO BUCKNAM AND ARCHER1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Magnetic separator machines for separating from each other ores, minerals and other materials having different magnetic phases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |