USPTO serial 77864944
LANDLORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDLORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Reidy
Daniel Reidy Law Office of Daniel Reidy1230 Spring Street, Suite BSt. Helena, CA 94574UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bags for skateboards; Ball bearings for skateboards; Bindings for alpine skis; Covers for ski bindings; Edges of skis; Harnesses specially adapted for carrying snowboards, skis and skateboards; Nuts and bolts for skateboards; Portable ski carriers; Protective padding for skateboarding; Scrapers for skis; Skateboard decks; Skateboard grip tapes; Skateboard rails; Skateboard riser pads; Skateboard trucks; Skateboard wheels; Skateboards; Ski bags; Ski bindings; Ski bindings and parts therefor; Ski brakes; Ski cases; Ski covers; Ski edges; Ski poles; Ski ropes; Ski scrapers; Ski sticks; Ski wax; Skis; Snow skis; Sole coverings for skis; Storage racks for ski and sports equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |