Drawing for PAPILLON

USPTO serial 77865803

PAPILLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAPILLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan M. Kornfield

Susan M. Kornfield Bodman PLC201 S. Division Street, Suite 400Ann Arbor, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CandyABANDONED—
032Beer and fruit flavored beveragesABANDONED—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodkaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 2, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 31, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 30, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance