USPTO serial 77865920
MOPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond R. Ferrera
RAYMOND R FERRERA ADAMS AND REESE LLP1201 MCKINNEY ST STE 4400HOUSTON, TX 77010-2001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Administration, billing and account deduction on behalf of others for the purpose of promoting the purchase of mobile content in real-time without the use of a credit card | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 2009 |
| 036 | Payment services, namely, electronic payments made through a mobile device; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions, prepaid accounts management and payment options using a mobile device at point of sale that allows consumers to purchase mobile content in real-time without the use of a credit card; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions, prepaid accounts management and payment options for processing and payment of subscription services, namely, news, pay-tv, and memberships using a mobile device that allows consumers to process subscription services without the use of a credit card; real-time mobile debit payment processing services, namely, providing electronic processing of electronic commerce payment services enabling consumers to purchase goods and services from merchants, namely, establishing funded prepaid accounts used to purchase goods and services via telephone, via internet, via digital communication transfer device, and via internet; electronic processing of purchase data to mobile phone bill; electronic processing and payment from prepaid mobile account; electronic processing of prepaid mobile accounts, namely, account deductions and account deposits; providing a wide variety of payment services, namely, purchase billing processing, bill processing with mobile phone provider, prepaid account deduction, prepaid account deposit, conducted via a global computer network and via a global mobile phone network | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 2009 |
| 038 | Electronic services, namely, electronic data transmission for consumers and merchants to process via telephone, via digital communication devices, via the Internet and via television; mobile media services, namely, electronic transmission of entertainment media content in the nature of ring tones, graphics, text, downloadable computer games, data, videos, television, software, and music via a global computer network and mobile telephones, digital players and wireless devices; communication and telecommunication services, namely, providing multi-user access to telecommunications networks, computer networks, wireless networks and satellite networks; wireless digital messaging services; transmitting and receiving sound, voices, video, images, text, documents, data and information via computer terminals, communication networks and wireless devices; providing multi-user access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections and wireless access to global and private computer networks for the exchange of text messaging and information and to send and receive electronic mail; paging services; providing transmission services, namely, streaming audio and video material on the Internet; wireless digital messaging services | ABANDONED | Aug 25, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |