USPTO serial 77865923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jongno-gu, Seoul, KR
Jongno-gu, Seoul, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory A. Nelson
GREGORY A. NELSON NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG, LLP525 OKEECHOBEE BLVD FL 15WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-6350UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electric massage apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Kumdo plastrons; Kumdo masks; Kumdo wooden swords; Kumdo bamboo swords; Discuses; Toy pistols for games; Golf bags with or without wheels; Golf balls; Divot repair tools; Golf gloves; Golf clubs; Targets; Baseball bases; Gauntlets; Swings; Basketballs; Climbers' harness; Rackets; Racket cases; Strings for rackets; Exercise equipment, namely, powered treadmills for running and rowing machines; Roller skates; Rocking horses; Knee guards for athletic use; Slides; Body boards; Barbells; Relay batons; Twirling batons; Volleyballs; Shuttlecocks; Batting gloves; Boxing gloves; Boxing mouth guards; Sports equipment for boxing, namely, punching mitts and belly protectors; Boxing equipment, namely, hand wraps; Punching bags; Bowling bags; Bowling gloves; Bowling balls; Bowling apparatus and machinery; Skittles games; Bobsleds; Hunting game calls; Paintball guns; Guards for athletic use for wrists, elbows, knees, and shins; Surfboard leashes; Surf boards; Surf skis; Masts for sailboards; Harness specially adapted for carrying sailboards; Handballs; Water polo balls; Water skis; Skateboards; Apparatus for playing squash, namely, rackets and balls; Skis; Ski sticks; Sole coverings for skis; Scrapers for skis; Seal skins coverings for ski bindings; Sling shots, Spring boards, See-saws, Dumbbells; Ice skates; Pommel horses for gymnastic; Baseballs; Baseball gloves; Baseball bat cases; Baseball batting gloves; Baseball catchers' masks; Baseball mitts; Baseball bats; Baseball bases; Chest protectors for baseball; Bows for archery; Weight lifting gloves; Weight lifting belts; Rosin used by athletes; Stationary exercise bicycles; Snow globes, Snow shoes; Starting blocks or sports; Chest expanders, Sailboards; Javelins for field sports, Iron shots specifically for use in the shot put competition; Vaulting poles; Prefabricated inflatable swimming pools; Skipping ropes; Horizontal bars for gymnastics; Benches for exercise; Spring boards for gymnastic; Vaulting horses for gymnastics; Rings for gymnastics; Soccer balls; Golf bags for golf clubs; Bags specially designed to hold cricket equipment; Clay pigeon traps; Clay pigeons; Table tennis balls; Table tennis nets; Tables for table tennis; Table tennis rackets; Table tennis paddle cases; Sports training apparatus, namely, tennis ball return machines; Tennis balls; Tennis nets; Trampolines; Punching-balls for boxing practice; Paintballs for paintball guns; Fencing masks; Protective padding for fencing; Sabres for fencing; Gauntlets for fencing; Balance beams for gymnastics; Parallel bars for gymnastic; Field hockey balls; Hockey pucks; Hockey sticks; leg and shin guards for playing hockey; Hockey gloves; Hurdles for use in athletics; Arrows for archery, Quivers for archery; Bows for archery; Bowstrings; Dumb-bell shafts for weight lifting; Exercise equipment, namely, exercise bands; nets for sports; horizontal bars for high jump; hammer for hammer throw | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 7, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |