USPTO serial 77866317
EVERY TAX NEED FOR EVERY TAXPAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERY TAX NEED FOR EVERY TAXPAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Providencialies, TC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Shannon
JOHN P. SHANNON MEREK, BLACKMON & VOORHEES, LLC673 S WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-4109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Tax services, namely, tax return preparation and filing; providing web sites featuring tax-related advisory information and discussion forms | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely, tax debt settlement and resolution services; financial services, namely, tax default collection mitigation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |