USPTO serial 77866338
GAMEPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAMEPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Prenton
James Prenton InterFocusLaw, LLP580 California Street, Suite 500San Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and leisure services, namely, providing on-line electronic games, providing on-line computer games, providing on-line video games, providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games, providing games and activities featuring avatars, reality simulation and contests; providing information regarding entertainment and leisure services, namely, games, on-line games, video games, interactive games, avatars, providing virtual environments in which users can interact for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposes, simulation and conducting on-line contests; on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring topics concerning computer and video gaming, music and gaming culture; providing video gaming information regarding rankings of scores by means of a global computer network | ABANDONED | Mar 25, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |