USPTO serial 77866793
BAY LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAY LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ponte Vedra, FL
Ponte Vedra, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian S. Steinberger
BRIAN S STEINBERGER101 BREVARD AVENUECOCOA, FL 32922-7904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Print materials, namely, bumper stickers; pens, sets of pens, pencils, erasers, pencil toppers in the nature of decorative pencil-top ornaments, notepads, calendars, blank cards, gift cards, greeting cards, business cards, writing and note paper, postcards, decals, paper labels, bank checks, checkbook covers, rubber stamps, pressure sensitive graphics for application to automobiles, transferable temporary tattoos, stickers, posters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |