USPTO serial 77866814
YR YVES ROCHER ELIXIR 7.9
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4292638Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2013
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with YR YVES ROCHER ELIXIR 7.9?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
La Gacilly, FR
Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert H. Finn
HERBERT H. FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP77 W WACKER DR STE 3100CHICAGO, IL 60601-4904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON MEDICATED SKIN-CARE PREPARATIONS FOR MOISTURIZING, CLEANSING, VITALIZING, PURIFYING AND IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF THE BODY AND THE FACE; NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE, ANTI-BLEMISH, ANTI-AGING AND WRINKLE REDUCER SKIN PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CREAMS, LOTIONS AND GELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 14, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks owned by Laboratoires de Biologie Vegetale Yves Rocher
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named YR YVES ROCHER ELIXIR 7.9
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |