Drawing for REFRESHING BEVERAGES

USPTO serial 77866899

REFRESHING BEVERAGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFRESHING BEVERAGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Herman

2100 WILMINGTON RDNEW CASTLE, PA 16105-1931UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Soft drinks, namely, carbonated soft drinksACTIVEOct 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 30, 2010PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 8, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance