Drawing for FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS

USPTO serial 77867043

FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FROM RESEARCH TO RESULTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay R. Sherman

KAY R. SHERMAN Gallop, Johnson & Neuman, L.C.101 S. HANLEY ROAD, SUITE 1700ST. LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Device used to evaluate the reactive and sorptive capacity of activated carbon and other activated filter media used in ventilation systems and determining the remaining life of such filter, and computer software for use with such device; digital electro-optical sensors; software for tactical military and law enforcement for use with electro-optical sensors; software for standoff detection of liveness and wellness and for security sensing of intrusion; software for medical diagnostics; photonic instrumentation for military and industrial use, namely, hyperspectral and multispectral imaging systems comprised of an optical camera, central processing units, operational software, graphical user interface, spectral filter and diagnostic and image analysis software; computer hardware and software for network centric digital communications, sensing, and data management and security; computer hardware and software for network simulation; computer software for digital information compression, encryption, and assurance; black box information system simulators comprised of sensors, sensor arrays, computer networks, communications software for connecting computer network users, nodes and central processing units for processing information; distributed electronic sensors; distributed electronic chemical sensors; distributed photonic sensors, namely, photoelectric sensors; distributed electronic acoustic sensors; computers; information transmission and processing networks, namely, computer network hubs, switches, nodes, servers and routersACTIVE—
042Research and development services in the fields of national defense, biotechnology, health care and agriculture and law enforcement; computer services, namely, hardware and software testing and evaluation services in the fields of national defense, law enforcement, biotechnology, health care, and agricultureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance