USPTO serial 77867120
MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW D. PRICE
ANDREW D. PRICE VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Calculating machines; Blank floppy computer discs; Computer operating programs, recorded; Computer peripheral devices; Computer software, namely, computer anti-virus software, computer graphics software, computer communications software to allow customers to access bank account information and transact bank business, computer search engine software; Blank magnetic data carriers; Blank integrated circuit cards, being blank smart cards; Notebook computers; Computer game programs; Readers, namely, bar code readers, Card readers for credit cards, Flash card readers, Optical disk readers, Smart card readers; Apparatus for recording, transmission, processing and reproduction of sound, images or data; Electric meters; Electronic agendas; Transmitters of electronic signals; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Electronic monitors and monitor modules for monitoring electric current and electrical signals; Semiconductors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical project studies, namely, engineering services, particularly technical project planning and design engineering of lines for the processing of web products; Research and development for new products for others; Computer programming; Computer software design; Computer system design services; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Computer systems analysis; Maintenance of computer software; Installation of computer software; Recovery of computer data; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |