USPTO serial 77867229
NO. 1 FORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2012
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NO. 1 FORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
XAVIER MORALES
XAVIER MORALES LAW OFFICE OF XAVIER MORALESPO BOX 3256AUSTIN, TX 78764United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Tool boxes of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Caulking guns; Chisels; Draw tape reels; Extensions for hand tools; Fishing tackle pliers; Golf shoe spike wrenches; Hand tools for removing the outer coating on a lottery ticket; Hand tools for use in carving or decorating pumpkins, mini-pumpkins, gourds, and other fruits and vegetables, namely, knives, saws, scoops, chisels and drills; Hand tools, namely, asphalt shingle removers; Hand tools, namely, automobile sheet metal dent repair tool; Hand tools, namely, bolt cutters; Hand tools, namely, bulb planters; Hand tools, namely, clamps; Hand tools, namely, concrete movers; Hand tools, namely, crimping irons; Hand tools, namely, dicing blades, slitting blades, optically transparent blades, optically transmitting blades; Hand tools, namely, dies; Hand tools, namely, ditch bank blades; Hand tools, namely, drills; Hand tools, namely, engravers; Hand tools, namely, files; Hand tools, namely, foundry ladles; Hand tools, namely, fruit pickers; Hand tools, namely, grass hooks; Hand tools, namely, grass whips; Hand tools, namely, hammers; Hand tools, namely, hand benders for use on pipes and conduits; Hand tools, namely, hand jacks; Hand tools, namely, hand tools for skimming wall repairs in small or tight areas with spackle, joint compound, putty, or smoothing vinyl lettering; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated device to aid with tying and untying knots; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps; Hand tools, namely, hand-operated reaching devices for picking up and removing trash, litter and objects; Hand tools, namely, hatchets; Hand tools, namely, hex keys wrenches; Hand tools, namely, knife sharpeners; Hand tools, namely, lawn aerators; Hand tools, namely, loppers; Hand tools, namely, lottery ticket scrapers; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grinding wheels; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated grindstones; Hand tools, namely, manually-operated sharpening wheels; Hand tools, namely, mauls; Hand tools, namely, miter boxes; Hand tools, namely, mitre boxes; Hand tools, namely, nail sets; Hand tools, namely, nippers; Hand tools, namely, nut drivers; Hand tools, namely, paint scrapers; Hand tools, namely, picks; Hand tools, namely, pikes; Hand tools, namely, pincers; Hand tools, namely, planers; Hand tools, namely, planes; Hand tools, namely, post hole diggers; Hand tools, namely, pruners; Hand tools, namely, pruning saws; Hand tools, namely, punches; Hand tools, namely, putty knives; Hand tools, namely, rammers; Hand tools, namely, rasps; Hand tools, namely, ratchet wrenches; Hand tools, namely, reamers; Hand tools, namely, ripping bars; Hand tools, namely, rubbing bricks for sanding; Hand tools, namely, sanders; Hand tools, namely, sanding sponges; Hand tools, namely, saws; Hand tools, namely, scrapers; Hand tools, namely, screwdrivers; Hand tools, namely, sheet metal shrinking and stretching device; Hand tools, namely, socket sets; Hand tools, namely, socket wrenches; Hand tools, namely, sod lifters; Hand tools, namely, squares; Hand tools, namely, surfboard wax removal tool; Hand tools, namely, tampers; Hand tools, namely, taps; Hand tools, namely, tongs; Hand tools, namely, tools for placing a rope or other flexible member through an eye or around a target object; Hand tools, namely, transplanters; Hand tools, namely, vices; Hand tools, namely, wedges; Hand tools, namely, weed cutters; Hand tools, namely, weed diggers; Hand tools, namely, wire cutters; Hand tools, namely, wire nippers; Hand tools, namely, wire strippers; Hand tools, namely, wrecking bars, stripping bars, small bars and nail pullers, San Angelo bars, tamper bars, wedge point bars, pitch point bars; Hand tools, namely, wrenches; Hand-operated tools, namely, chisels; Hand-tools, namely, wire crimpers; Knives; Monkey wrenches; Multi-function, non-electronic, expandable hand tool comprised of push-pull and hook attachments with magnetic and non-magnetic ends for use in grasping objects and aiding individuals in getting dressed; Nut wrenches; Pipe wrenches; Pliers; Ratchet hand tool for the installation and removal of alpine ski and snowboard racing gates; Roll-up fabric container for hand tools; Screw wrenches; Screwdrivers; Spark wrenches; Torque wrenches; Wrenches | ACTIVE | Nov 6, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Express Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Express Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Express Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named NO. 1 FORGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 8, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |