USPTO serial 77867407
KING ARTHUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KING ARTHUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air pumps of two-wheeled motor vehicles or bicycles; Baskets adapted for bicycles; Bicycle bells; Bicycle brakes; Bicycle chains; Bicycle frames; Bicycle frames and bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle gears; Bicycle grip tape; Bicycle handlebar grips; Bicycle horns; Bicycle kickstands; Bicycle parts, namely, brake shoes; Bicycle parts, namely, change-speed gears; Bicycle parts, namely, disk wheels; Bicycle parts, namely, drive chains; Bicycle parts, namely, drive trains; Bicycle parts, namely, fork crown covers; Bicycle parts, namely, forks; Bicycle parts, namely, front fork joints; Bicycle parts, namely, gear wheels; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar ends; Bicycle parts, namely, handle bar stems; Bicycle parts, namely, sprockets; Bicycle parts, namely, tubes and connectors for bicycle frames; Bicycle pedals; Bicycle pumps; Bicycle racks for vehicles; Bicycle saddle covers; Bicycle saddles; Bicycle seat posts; Bicycle stands; Bicycle tags; Bicycle trailers (riyakah); Bicycle training harnesses; Bicycle training wheels; Bicycle water bottle cages; Bicycle wheels; Bicycle wheels, rims and structural parts therefor; Bicycle-mounted pet seat; Bicycles; Components for bicycles, namely, headsets which provide a rotatable interface between the bicycle fork and the bicycle frame; Delivery bicycles; Elastomeric appliques for placement onto motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, and bicycles to prevent riders from slipping; Fitted bicycle covers; Frames for bicycles; Frames, for luggage carriers, for bicycles; Front and rear bicycle rack packs; Gear levers for bicycle wheels; Handlebars; Inner tubes; Inner tubes for bicycles; Motors for bicycles; Mountain bicycles; Mudguards; Pannier bags for bicycles; Racing bicycles; Racks for vehicles for Bicycles; Rims for bicycle wheels; Road racing bicycles; Saddle covers for bicycles; Saddlebags for bicycles; Saddles for bicycles; Safety pads for bicycles; Spoke clips for bicycle wheels; Spokes for bicycle wheels; Structural parts of bicycles; Suspension systems for Bicycles; Tandem bicycles; Tire inflators; Tires; Tires for children's bicycles; Touring bicycles; Velomobile bodies, namely, specially adapted for weather protection shells for use on bicycles and adult tricycles; Water bottle cages for bicycles; Water bottle holders for bicycles; Wheel hubs; Wheel hubs for Bicycles; Wheel rims; Wheels for bicycles, cycles | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |