Drawing for LAMAR

USPTO serial 77867476

LAMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terri DiPaolo

Terri DiPaolo Authentic Brands Group, LLC100 West 33rd Street, Suite 1007New York, NY 10001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Bicycle helmets; cases for spectacles and sunglasses; frames for spectacles and sunglasses; lenses for sunglasses; protective helmets; snow goggles; sports eyewear; sports helmets; sunglassesACTIVE—
016Binders; colour pencils; coloured pens; drawing rulers; envelopes for stationery use; felt pens; felt writing pens; file pockets for stationery use; folders; gift wrapping paper; lap boards for reading and writing; loose leaf paper; notebook paper; office stationery; paper; pen and pencil cases and boxes; pen or pencil holders; pencil or pen boxes; pencil ornaments; pencil sharpeners; pens; pouches for writing instruments; printed calendars; rubber erasers; wire-bound notebooks; stationery; stationery-type portfolios; writing instruments; writing padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 1, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 13, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 20, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance