Drawing for KARMA IN A CAN

USPTO serial 77867650

KARMA IN A CAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KARMA IN A CAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor K. Sapphire

Victor K. Sapphire Michelman Robinson, LLP15760 Ventura Blvd., 5th FloorEncino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Breath mints for use as a breath freshener; personal fragrances; perfumes and colognes; cosmetics; soaps; skin, facial and anti-aging cleansers; non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and nails for personal use; personal deodorantsACTIVE—
030Chewing gum; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, herbal food beverages, tea-based beverages and grain-based beveragesACTIVE—
032Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, energy drinks, bottled artesian water, bottled water, spring water, soda pop and fruit juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance