USPTO serial 77868630
HITEC-LA POWER YOUR PRACTICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HITEC-LA POWER YOUR PRACTICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George C. Rondeau, Jr.
DAVID H DEITS DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1201 THIRD AVENUESUITE 2200SEATTLE, WA 98101-3045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting, strategic planning and business advisory services in the field of electronic healthcare information systems; purchasing and procurement services, namely, procuring of contracts for others for the purchase of goods and services in the field of electronic healthcare information systems and the design of group purchasing plans for goods and services in the field of electronic healthcare information systems; and public advocacy to promote the effective implementation and use of electronic healthcare information systems; technical support services, namely, technical advice concerning the purchase of electronic healthcare information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Technical support services, namely, technical advice concerning the installation, repair, upgrading, and maintenance of electronic healthcare information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs in the field of electronic healthcare information systems and providing educational information in the field of electronic healthcare information systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, technical advice concerning the design of electronic healthcare information systems; technical support services, namely, technical advice concerning the operation of electronic healthcare information systems; and providing technical information in the field of electronic healthcare information systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
- Other trademarks owned by Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HITEC-LA POWER YOUR PRACTICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |